NINE ENGINEERING ENGAGEMENTS · THREE OPERATING LEVELS

Know what will be built,
what it costs, and how it will be accepted.

Production automation should not begin with an opaque sales process or an unbounded promise. Every standard engagement names its price range, system boundary, intended buyer, timeline, outputs, exclusions, recovery duty, and acceptance evidence.

THE 3 × 3 OFFER ARCHITECTURE

Decide. Deploy. Operate.

Tier I establishes the right automation boundary. Tier II delivers production capability. Tier III owns lifecycle health, reliability, and continuous improvement.

TIER I

Automation Intelligence

Establish what should be automated, what should remain human, and what architecture and controls the investment requires.

AAS-1AONE-TIME

Automation Signal Intensive

$750–$1,500

A focused architecture session that determines whether one operational problem should be automated, redesigned, integrated, purchased, or left alone.

Typical timeline
3–5 business days
Best for
An operator or technical leader who needs a build/no-build decision before spending on tools or development.
  • Pre-session workflow review
  • 90-minute engineering session
  • Automation boundary
  • Risk and dependency brief
AAS-1BONE-TIME

Automation Systems Diagnostic

$5,000–$15,000

A technical and operational assessment of one workflow or automation estate across process, systems, data, APIs, failure modes, controls, volume, cost, and ownership.

Typical timeline
2–4 weeks
Best for
Teams with fragile automations, repeated manual work, integration debt, unclear ROI, or no reliable view of production health.
  • Current workflow and integration topology
  • Volume and failure baseline
  • Automation opportunity portfolio
  • Security and recovery findings
AAS-1CONE-TIME

Technical Operating Blueprint

$25,000–$50,000

A build-ready architecture for a consequential automation capability, including interfaces, data, authority, failure behavior, observability, release, ownership, and recovery.

Typical timeline
4–8 weeks
Best for
Organizations preparing a complex integration, agent system, control room, data pipeline, or automation platform investment.
  • Target system architecture
  • API, event, and data contracts
  • Identity and authority model
  • Execution and exception design
TIER II

Production Deployment

Engineer, integrate, test, release, observe, and document production automation systems with explicit recovery and ownership.

AAS-2AONE-TIME

AI Workflow Automation System

$10,000–$50,000

A production workflow system connecting triggers, business rules, AI or agents where justified, human approvals, applications, exceptions, monitoring, and documented ownership.

Typical timeline
4–10 weeks
Best for
A team ready to replace one expensive or unreliable manual workflow with a governed operating capability.
  • Production workflow implementation
  • Required integrations and adapters
  • Human approval and exception paths
  • Operational telemetry
AAS-2BONE-TIME

Department Automation Command Center

$75,000–$150,000

A department control plane joining workflow intake, queues, automations, agents, integrations, approvals, telemetry, incidents, cost, history, and management reporting.

Typical timeline
8–16 weeks
Best for
Departments running multiple workflows and automation tools without unified operating visibility, governance, or reliable handoffs.
  • Department automation architecture
  • Workflow and agent portfolio
  • Integration and event fabric
  • Role-specific command center
AAS-2CONE-TIME

Enterprise Automation Operating System

$250,000–$500,000

An enterprise automation foundation for governed workflow intake, reusable services, agents, integrations, data movement, environments, release, observability, recovery, and ownership.

Typical timeline
Phased over 4–9 months
Best for
Organizations consolidating disconnected automation initiatives into one scalable engineering and operating model.
  • Enterprise automation platform architecture
  • Reusable integration and workflow services
  • Agent and human authority controls
  • Environment and release system
TIER III

Managed Automation Operations

Operate and improve the automation estate through monitoring, incident response, lifecycle maintenance, cost control, and proof.

AAS-3AMONTHLY

Automation Systems Stewardship

$3,000–$7,500/month

Scheduled technical stewardship for an existing automation estate: architecture review, lifecycle maintenance, dependency risk, telemetry review, cost, incidents, and improvement planning.

Typical timeline
Quarterly commitment
Best for
Teams that own production automations but need senior engineering continuity and an independent operating review.
  • Monthly estate review
  • Dependency and lifecycle register
  • Incident and risk review
  • Architecture guidance
AAS-3BMONTHLY

Fractional Automation Operations Office

$10,000–$25,000/month

A fractional production automation office responsible for intake, prioritization, engineering standards, release review, incident coordination, estate health, vendors, and continuous improvement.

Typical timeline
Typical 6-month mandate
Best for
Organizations with growing automation demand but no mature internal automation engineering and operations function.
  • Automation portfolio operations
  • Build and release governance
  • Weekly operating cadence
  • Incident and lifecycle management
AAS-3CMONTHLY

Embedded Automation Systems Office

$25,000–$100,000+/month

An embedded engineering and operating function coordinating automation strategy, architecture, production delivery, reliability, security, telemetry, incident response, proof, and capability development.

Typical timeline
Multi-quarter mandate
Best for
Organizations treating automation and AI operations as a core business capability requiring continuing senior ownership and delivery coordination.
  • Embedded automation control office
  • Engineering portfolio and delivery system
  • Reliability and incident operations
  • Security and release governance
ENGINEERING COMMERCIAL STANDARDS

Boundaries before code.

Published ranges

Each range reflects the expected boundary for the named system. Final architecture, interfaces, schedule, acceptance tests, and fee are fixed in a written proposal.

Build/no-build discipline

The assessment may recommend process redesign, a commercial platform, internal configuration, a smaller engagement, another provider, or no automation.

Third-party costs

Cloud, software, model usage, licenses, devices, security testing, travel, and external specialists are excluded unless the proposal explicitly includes them.

Production access

No credentials or protected datasets belong in public intake. Environment and secret access begins only under a signed scope and least-authority plan.

Change control

New interfaces, materially different data, additional workflows, changed service levels, or expanded user populations require an accepted change decision.

Support boundary

Warranty, maintenance, response coverage, service objectives, and managed operations are stated per engagement. A build does not silently include unlimited support.

NOT SURE WHICH SYSTEM FITS?

Assess the workflow before selecting the tool.

The assessment captures volume, exceptions, systems, interfaces, data, risk, availability, recovery, ownership, economics, and proof. It routes to the smallest responsible next step.

Begin the engineering assessment